[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] BEAMER_HEADER in `org-latex-classes'
From: |
Sebastien Vauban |
Subject: |
Re: [O] BEAMER_HEADER in `org-latex-classes' |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Nov 2013 11:27:00 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (windows-nt) |
Hello,
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> "Sebastien Vauban" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I'd then propose the attached patch for the documentation.
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
>> BTW, what's the difference between #+LATEX_HEADER and #+LATEX_HEADER_EXTRA
>> lines, if both end up under the same umbrella ([EXTRA])? Couldn't we
>> suppress
>> the #+LATEX_HEADER_EXTRA keyword?
>
> According to section 12.7.2 in manual, LATEX_HEADER_EXTRA will not be
> loaded when previewing LaTeX snippets, unlike to LATEX_HEADER.
Shouldn't the similar principle be applied to BEAMER_HEADER, that is have a
BEAMER_HEADER_EXTRA keyword as well?
>> * ox-latex.el (org-latex-classes): Add BEAMER_HEADER in the
>> documentation string.
>
> `beamer' is a different back-end than `latex', or to put it differently,
> `latex' back-end is not supposed to know about `beamer'.
I understand.
> That's why no reference to `beamer' appears in `org-latex-classes'.
Though, this is only true as long as ox-beamer is not loaded. Because ox-beamer
does add "beamer" to `org-latex-classes' (which is right IMO).
> If documentation is needed, I think it should go in the manual, as
> a footnote close to the reference to BEAMER_HEADER.
OK.
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban