[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [PATCH] quick patch to org-habit todo state keywords
From: |
Aaron Ecay |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [PATCH] quick patch to org-habit todo state keywords |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Dec 2013 23:27:12 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.16+154~g96c0ce2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) |
Hi Ted,
Welcome to org-mode, and thanks for the patch!
I have one small comment:
2013ko abenudak 15an, Ted Wiles-ek idatzi zuen:
>
> Took out the hardcoded todo-state
>
> * lisp/org-habit.el
>
> The "DONE" keyword was hardcoded in. This is my first patch (ever, to
> anything).
>
> TINYCHANGE
>
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> lisp/org-habit.el | 3 ++-
>
> Modified lisp/org-habit.el
> diff --git a/lisp/org-habit.el b/lisp/org-habit.el
> index eba9037..69d0fa6 100644
> --- a/lisp/org-habit.el
> +++ b/lisp/org-habit.el
> @@ -200,7 +200,8 @@ This list represents a \"habit\" for the rest of this
> module."
> (count 0))
> (unless reversed (goto-char end))
> (while (and (< count maxdays)
> - (funcall search "- State \"DONE\".*\\[\\([^]]+\\)\\]" limit
> t))
> + (funcall search (format "- State \"%s\".*\\[\\([^]]+\\)\\]"
> + (car (reverse (car
> org-todo-keywords)))) limit t))
I think this will not be the correct value when the org-todo-keywords
variable contains characters for fast todo selection (cf. the fifth
paragraph of the docstring at C-h v org-todo-keywords). For example, my
org-todo-keywords is set to:
((sequence "TODO(t)" "NEXT(n)" "|" "DONE(d)")
(sequence "WAIT(w@/!)" "|" "CANCELLED(c@/!)"))
I think you can get the value you want with:
(concat "\\(" (mapconcat 'regexp-quote org-done-keywords "\\|") "\\)")
The org-done-keywords variable is not documented, but it is set (locally
in each buffer) to the list of done keywords in that buffer by the code
that initializes org mode. (I found and slightly adapted the above bit
of code from line 6283 of org.el, where some fontification regexps are
calculated.)
Aaron
PS You should make a new message to the list when you send a new patch,
rather than replying to another one. The replies interfere with the
threading algorithms in some MUAs which parse the References or
In-Reply-To header of the email in order to determine its parent.
--
Aaron Ecay
- [O] [parser] subscripts and underlines interacting badly, Aaron Ecay, 2013/12/10
- Re: [O] [parser] subscripts and underlines interacting badly, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/12/11
- Re: [O] [parser] subscripts and underlines interacting badly, Aaron Ecay, 2013/12/11
- Re: [O] [parser] subscripts and underlines interacting badly, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/12/11
- Re: [O] [parser] subscripts and underlines interacting badly, Aaron Ecay, 2013/12/12
- Re: [O] [parser] subscripts and underlines interacting badly, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/12/12
- Re: [O] [parser] subscripts and underlines interacting badly, Aaron Ecay, 2013/12/12
- Re: [O] [parser] subscripts and underlines interacting badly, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/12/12
- Re: [O] [parser] subscripts and underlines interacting badly, Aaron Ecay, 2013/12/15
- [O] [PATCH] quick patch to org-habit todo state keywords, Ted Wiles, 2013/12/15
- Re: [O] [PATCH] quick patch to org-habit todo state keywords,
Aaron Ecay <=
- Re: [O] [parser] subscripts and underlines interacting badly, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/12/17
- Re: [O] [parser] subscripts and underlines interacting badly, Aaron Ecay, 2013/12/18
- Re: [O] [parser] subscripts and underlines interacting badly, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/12/18