[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] mixed orgmode installation
From: |
Justin Gordon |
Subject: |
Re: [O] mixed orgmode installation |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Jan 2014 08:06:46 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Achim Gratz <Stromeko <at> nexgo.de> writes:
>
> John Hendy writes:
> > Then again, is Worg saying that if `M-x org-version` outputs the
> > "correct" answer... we're all set and there's nothing to worry about?
>
> The output of org-version is determined essentially by checking for two
> files from the installation and comparing where they would be loaded
> from. This catches the most common problems, but certainly not all. In
> particular, it won't see when the load-path has been changed after some
> parts of Org have already been loaded from someplace else (but
> org-reload will give a warning for this case).
>
> Regards,
> Achim.
If I byte compile a file, I get this message:
In org-jekyll-publish-to-html:
ox-jekyll.el:280:4:Warning: org-publish-org-to called with 5 arguments, but
accepts only 4
This is because my installation is pointing to the emacs default version rather
than my version from git. If I do C-h f and look up this function, I get
pointed
to the emacs default version.
However, if I do org-version, I get the proper new version.
However, if I do list-load-path-shadows, I can verify that org-publish is not
shadowed, and that's probably due to the fact that the new file is called
ox-publish.
How do I fix this???
I've tried
- Re: [O] mixed orgmode installation,
Justin Gordon <=