Re: [O] org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?

[Florian Beck]

On 29.01.2014 14:16, Nick Dokos wrote:

> But it's not just a matter of satisfying rules: it's a matter of making
> it easy on users.

That is why I don't recommend satisfying them here.

> Having a "bad" binding as well as a "good" binding for
> something would mean that if I load a minor mode that takes over the
> "bad" binding, I would then lose it in the major mode and have to
> remember the "good" binding. That's more confusing IMO than having a
> single "good" binding: if we need to retrain fingers, we need to retrain
> them once, not every time we load a minor mode that steps on some
> binding.

On the other hand, it doesn't happen "every time." The bindings had been 
working for years before one user reported a problem with some of them. 
The conflict is rare and doesn't require resolution. But it is polite to 
provide alternatives for bindings that might be shadowed.


--
Florian Beck