[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported
From: |
zwz |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Mar 2014 21:54:37 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Eric Schulte <address@hidden> writes:
>> Sorry for being unclear here. I wanted to propose different
>> behaviour for TAGs (lets say :noexport:) and the COMMENT keyword.
>> I am perfectly fine with :noexport: only prohibiting export but
>> still allowing evaluation.
>>
>> But I propose that COMMENT be more treated like a comment, so more
>> like a shorthand for commenting out that subtree using '# '.
>> That way, evaluation would be disabled.
>>
>> I see two benefits:
>> 1. It serves the use-case where one wants a subtree to be not
>> exported and not evaluated.
>> 2. It more resembles Orgs idea of comments.
>>
>> And since the other use case (no export but still evaluation) is
>> still very well supported via :noexport: there would be not too
>> much loss.
>>
>> (IIRC, the COMMENT keyword was close to removal from Orgs syntax
>> recently. So, why not add some real additional functionality to
>> it?)
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>
> This sounds like a good compromise to me. As you say, this should
> easily and visually support both use cases and is intuitive. I've not
> touched the export machinery myself, so I'll leave the implementation to
> Nicolas but I definitely support this approach.
>
> Best,
>
COMMENT is a good proposal. However, for someone new to org-mode, it is
difficult to tell the subtle difference between COMMENT and :noexport:.
IMO, it is more intuitive that :noexport: prohibits *both* export and
evaluation, and if some code in a :noexport: subtree is to be evaluated,
then it should be named and called in some other place.
- Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported, (continued)
- Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported, Andreas Leha, 2014/03/13
- Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported, John Hendy, 2014/03/13
- Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported, Eric Schulte, 2014/03/13
- Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported, Samuel Wales, 2014/03/14
- Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported, zwz, 2014/03/14
- Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported, Samuel Wales, 2014/03/14
- Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported, Samuel Wales, 2014/03/14
- Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported, Sebastien Vauban, 2014/03/14
- Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported, Andreas Leha, 2014/03/14
- Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported, Eric Schulte, 2014/03/14
- Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported,
zwz <=
- Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported, Nicolas Goaziou, 2014/03/15
- Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported, Eric Schulte, 2014/03/15
- Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported, Andreas Leha, 2014/03/17
- Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported, Nicolas Goaziou, 2014/03/24
- Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported, Eric Schulte, 2014/03/24
- Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported, Bastien, 2014/03/24
- Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported, Eric Schulte, 2014/03/24
- Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported, Samuel Wales, 2014/03/24
- Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported, Samuel Wales, 2014/03/24
- Re: [O] Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported, Sebastien Vauban, 2014/03/14