[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant?
From: |
Samuel Loury |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant? |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:30:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.17 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
Hi,
Alan Schmitt <address@hidden> writes:
> On 2014-04-28 19:18, Rene <address@hidden> writes:
> I have not defined an Energy property, but I recently played with date
> properties (and a user defined sorting function). If it's helpful to
> you, the code is there:
> https://github.com/brabalan/org-review/blob/master/org-review.el#L156
I looked at the code and I don't get what means the part of the code
getting the org-marker text property of a:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(get-text-property (point-min) 'org-marker a)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
In this part, the point-min returns the point-min of the current buffer
(the agenda buffer in that case) while the function looks for the
property into a.
I tried launching this code into a custom agenda compare function and I
get the error:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Args out of range: 1197, 1197
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
This makes sense since the agenda appears to be narrowed at that time so
that (point-min) returns 1197 and the a string at this time is not 1197
characters long.
Replacing (point-min) by 0 appears to work (I assumed the 0th character
of the string has the wanted text property).
My first guess of an energy cmp function is:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(defun org-energy-compare (a b)
(let* (
(ma (or (get-text-property 0 'org-marker a)
(get-text-property 0 'org-hd-marker a)))
(mb (or (get-text-property 0 'org-marker b)
(get-text-property 0 'org-hd-marker b)))
(energy_a (org-entry-get ma "Energy"))
(energy_b (org-entry-get mb "Energy"))
)
(cond
((and
(not energy_a)
(not energy_b)
)
nil
)
((and
energy_a
(not energy_b)
)
1
)
((and
(not energy_a)
energy_b
)
-1
)
((> energy_a energy_b)
1
)
((< energy_a energy_b)
-1
)
(t
nil
)
)
)
)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Incidentally, I don't manage to have edebug triggered in a custom org
agenda cmp function. I load the function with C-u C-M-x. the message
"Edebug: org-energy-compare" appears as usual. When I launch the agenda
I can see the function has been called since the entries are correctly
sorted. But I was never given the input to debug it. Do you know why?
--
Konubinix
GPG Key : 7439106A
Fingerprint: 5993 BE7A DA65 E2D9 06CE 5C36 75D2 3CED 7439 106A
pgppAoY9VglmD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant?, Rene, 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant?, Richard Lawrence, 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant?, Rene, 2014/04/28
- Re: [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant?, Alan Schmitt, 2014/04/29
- Re: [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant?,
Samuel Loury <=
- Re: [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant?, Alan Schmitt, 2014/04/29
- Re: [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant?, Samuel Loury, 2014/04/29
- Re: [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant?, Bastien, 2014/04/29
- Re: [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant?, Alan Schmitt, 2014/04/29
- Re: [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant?, Bastien, 2014/04/29