[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] State of the art in citations
From: |
Richard Lawrence |
Subject: |
Re: [O] State of the art in citations |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:36:37 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Vikas,
Vikas Rawal Lists <address@hidden> writes:
> On 26-Apr-2014, at 6:56 pm, Clément B. <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>> - Should I use biblatex instead of bibtex?
>>
>> You should. It is very powerful and straightforward. The manual
>> is great.
>
> Is the choice so clearcut?
>
> A lot of bibliographic databases provide bibtex-compatible citation
> information. How do you deal with that, when you shift to biblatex?
As I recently learned (thanks to this list!), biblatex supports .bib
files. So switching to biblatex is not an issue from this perspective:
you can continue to drop bibtex-compatible citation information into
your .bib file and use it with biblatex.
If ox-bibtex reads .bib files, that should continue to work, too.
Best,
Richard
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, (continued)
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Clément B ., 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Ken Mankoff, 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Thomas S. Dye, 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Ken Mankoff, 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Clément B ., 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, John Kitchin, 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Clément B ., 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Julian M. Burgos, 2014/04/28
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Julian M. Burgos, 2014/04/28
Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Vikas Rawal Lists, 2014/04/29
- Re: [O] State of the art in citations,
Richard Lawrence <=
Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Vikas Rawal Lists, 2014/04/29
Re: [O] State of the art in citations, Clément B ., 2014/04/27