[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [RFC] Org Minor Mode?
From: |
Ilya Shlyakhter |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [RFC] Org Minor Mode? |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:44:37 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Bastien <address@hidden> writes:
> We should absolutely avoid advice in code.
Fully agree. (I was thinking of using an flet-like construct to
temporarily rebind functions for the duration of calls, rather than
permanent advice -- see elu-flet in
https://github.com/notestaff/elu/blob/master/elu.el -- but, still agree.)
What would be the downside of abstracting away the headline syntax in
the Org code? (Other than the admittedly significant issue of
disturbing well-tested core code. On the other hand, abstracted code
would be more readable & maintainable; see e.g. Org syntax defined with
an rx-like extension:
https://github.com/notestaff/elu/blob/master/rxx-org.el , or with
Thorsten's drx.el )
Obviously this would be a lot of work, but the upside of having a full
Org minor mode (in particular for outshine-type use) would make it worth
it, for me at least.
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org Minor Mode?, (continued)
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org Minor Mode?, Thorsten Jolitz, 2014/04/13
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org Minor Mode?, Bastien, 2014/04/18
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org Minor Mode?, Thorsten Jolitz, 2014/04/18
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org Minor Mode?, Bastien, 2014/04/19
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org Minor Mode?, Thorsten Jolitz, 2014/04/19
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org Minor Mode?, Bastien, 2014/04/19
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org Minor Mode?, Ilya Shlyakhter, 2014/04/24
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org Minor Mode?, Thorsten Jolitz, 2014/04/25
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org Minor Mode?, Bastien, 2014/04/29
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org Minor Mode?,
Ilya Shlyakhter <=
Re: [O] [RFC] Org Minor Mode?, Ilya Shlyakhter, 2014/04/24