[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [PATCH] Improve usage of odt content templates
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [PATCH] Improve usage of odt content templates |
Date: |
Wed, 21 May 2014 14:47:37 +0200 |
Hello,
Christian Kellermann <address@hidden> writes:
> I first thought about using ODT_STYLES_FILE in the list form and
> pick out the content.xml from there, but maybe that's a bit unexpected
> as one might use a different content than from the style.
>
> But the control flow as it is now would need to be refactored to
> make this a nice patch too.
>
> I shall resend this patch with proper docstrings and manual patches
> if you like.
Please do.
>> I think this is a more general issue: should we implement an
>>
>> #+OPTIONS: title:nil
>>
>> feature? I think it makes some sense since we already have date:nil and
>> author:nil. In any case, keywords are not meant to be used for booleans.
>> This should be an OPTIONS item.
>
> I don't feel qualified to decide on this. I can provide the needed
> patches though.
Introducing the item is easy, but making something out of it in each
back-end is not, as it requires to define what title:nil means there. In
particular, should it be "an empty title" or something else?
For example, ascii back-end provides a banner as its title. Should
title:nil remove the title from the banner or should it remove the
banner altogether, thus overriding date:t and author:t items.
Likewise, should title:nil insert "\title{}" in a LaTeX document header,
remove the "\maketitle{}" line, or perhaps, both?
It seems that you answered to that question regarding ODT back-end
though.
WDYT?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Re: [O] [PATCH] Improve usage of odt content templates, Bastien, 2014/05/20