[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow
From: |
Grant Rettke |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 19:01:58 -0500 |
Understood. I will start testing.
Just out of curiosity, knowing full well that it will break the
tangle, and also since I hadn't tried
the quick and dirty flag, I ran it with this to see how long it took:
(setq org-babel-common-header-args-w-values nil)
It went from 936 seconds (15 minutes)
Down to 279 (4 minutes).
Now I am wondering if it is worth converting my document *not* to use
property inheritance...
What would you folks do?
Grant Rettke | ACM, ASA, FSF, IEEE, SIAM
address@hidden | http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/
“Wisdom begins in wonder.” --Socrates
((λ (x) (x x)) (λ (x) (x x)))
“Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop
taking it seriously.” --Thompson
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Eric Schulte <address@hidden> wrote:
> Grant Rettke <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I still want to be using org,, so my plan for now then is to write a
>> pre-processing script for before org-babel-tangle is run that:
>>
>> 1. Checks each headline
>> 2. Checks if there is a source block
>> 3. If that source block doesn't have a noweb-ref name, and there is
>> another source block under that
>> headline, then "merge" it with the next source block of the same
>> nature in that heading.
>>
>> That is off the top of my head, and I will try it by hand, first and
>> see if it tangles the same result.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> Perhaps an easier workaround would be to customize the value of
> `org-babel-common-header-args-w-values'. This variable determines which
> header arguments are checked for in properties. If you remove all
> header arguments from this variable which you know are not used in a
> property, it may dramatically speed up tangle time.
>
> This may reduce the utility of some convenience functions, but should
> not have too large of an impact on overall functionality.
>
> Best,
> Eric
>
> --
> Eric Schulte
> https://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte
> PGP: 0x614CA05D (see https://u.fsf.org/yw)
- [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Grant Rettke, 2014/06/17
- Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Aaron Ecay, 2014/06/17
- Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Sebastien Vauban, 2014/06/18
- Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Eric Schulte, 2014/06/18
- Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Grant Rettke, 2014/06/18
- Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Eric Schulte, 2014/06/19
- Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow,
Grant Rettke <=
- Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Grant Rettke, 2014/06/19
- Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Grant Rettke, 2014/06/20
Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Grant Rettke, 2014/06/18
Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Nick Dokos, 2014/06/17
Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Thorsten Jolitz, 2014/06/18
Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Andreas Leha, 2014/06/18