Re: [O] Thoughts on weaving variable documentation

[Grant Rettke]

org-docco is something that comes to mind:

http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/index.html
Grant Rettke | ACM, ASA, FSF, IEEE, SIAM
address@hidden | http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/
“Wisdom begins in wonder.” --Socrates
((λ (x) (x x)) (λ (x) (x x)))
“Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop
taking it seriously.” --Thompson


On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Grant Rettke <address@hidden> wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> A lot of people are weaving their Emacs init files for the obvious
> reason: it is difficult to remember why
> we configured stuff and other people definitely won't know why we did
> it. There is a common operation
> that occurs though when other people read our Emacs init:
>
> 1. They open it up in Emacs
> 2. Find what looks interesting
> 3. Do a C-h f or C-h v on it and learn about it
>
> Makes total sense.
>
> What I got curious about is for this specific use case, people
> scanning other people's configs, how I
> could make it easier. A thought is to weave the docstrings for
> variables right into the weaved file any
> time a variable is set. I am thinking something like this:
>
> 1. When the weave occurs
> 2. Look at each line of code that starts with a setq
> 3. Look up the docstring for the variable
> 4. TBD: Weave that documentation into the output.
>
> That is the idea, at least.
>
> My question is:
> 1. What are the standard mechanisms to do something like this within
> the ob lifecycle?
> 2. What do you think in general?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Grant Rettke | ACM, ASA, FSF, IEEE, SIAM
> address@hidden | http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/
> “Wisdom begins in wonder.” --Socrates
> ((λ (x) (x x)) (λ (x) (x x)))
> “Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop
> taking it seriously.” --Thompson