Re: [O] babel, header arguments.

[Thomas S. Dye]

address@hidden (jenia.ivlev) writes:

> address@hidden (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
>
>> Aloha,
>>
>> address@hidden (jenia.ivlev) writes:
>>
>>> Also, what if I want to import the actual function defintion into
>>> another src block:
>>>
>>>     #+begin_src scheme
>>>         (+ (my-plus 3 4) 1)
>>>     #+end_src
>>>     something here that import the previous function definitions
>>>
>>> Is that possible?
>>
>> Yes, see section 14.10 Noweb reference syntax in the manual.
>>
>> You'll have something that looks like this:
>>
>> #+header: :noweb yes
>> #+begin_src scheme
>>   <<previous-function-definition>>
>>   (+ (previous-function 3 4) 1)
>> #+end_src
>>
>> hth,
>> Tom
>
> What do you mean? <<previous-function-definition>> should be replaced
> with the actual function definition? But I use babel-mode so that I can
> interlace code in a natural language document. I want these src blocks
> to be separate.
>
>

Sorry, it refers to the name of the source code block.

,-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| The “noweb” (see <http://www.cs.tufts.edu/~nr/noweb/>) Literate         
| Programming system allows named blocks of code to be referenced by using
| the familiar Noweb syntax:                                              
|                                                                         
|      <<code-block-name>>                                                
`-------------------------------------------------------------------------

hth,
Tom

-- 
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com