[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Is #+SEQ_TODO: TODO | legal?
|
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
|
Subject: |
Re: [O] Is #+SEQ_TODO: TODO | legal? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:46:45 +0100 |
Hello,
Marcin Borkowski <address@hidden> writes:
> for some reason I want to have a TODO item that /cannot/ be (directly,
> by C-c C-t) made into a "done" state. It seems that
>
> #+SEQ_TODO: TODO |
>
> works. Is that legal?
It may seem to work, but you are probably going to run into subtle
problems. The TODO/DONE code expects both a TODO and a DONE states.
Reconsider your reason!
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou