[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [bug] Alignment bug in clock tables
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [bug] Alignment bug in clock tables |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Feb 2015 15:22:03 +0100 |
Hello,
Stormking <address@hidden> writes:
> Without any effect, it seems. I wonder if anybody actually uses these
> features.
What character do you suggest to use instead of \emph?
"*" is not possible due to a collision with bold syntax (i.e. "***" is
parsed as a bold star).
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
- Re: [O] [bug] Alignment bug in clock tables, Francesco Pizzolante, 2015/02/11
- Re: [O] [bug] Alignment bug in clock tables, Stormking, 2015/02/18
- Re: [O] [bug] Alignment bug in clock tables,
Nicolas Goaziou <=
- Re: [O] [bug] Alignment bug in clock tables, Stormking, 2015/02/18
- Re: [O] [bug] Alignment bug in clock tables, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/02/18
- Re: [O] [bug] Alignment bug in clock tables, Stormking, 2015/02/18
- Re: [O] [bug] Alignment bug in clock tables, Stormking, 2015/02/18
- Re: [O] [bug] Alignment bug in clock tables, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/02/18