[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal
From: |
Matt Price |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Mar 2015 19:43:07 -0500 |
On Mar 3, 2015 3:43 AM, "Nicolas Goaziou" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Richard Lawrence <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> To support multi cites, we must first decide how the parsed will present
> >> information, i.e., what are the properties in the following case
> >>
> >> [cite:pre; pre1 @k1 post1; pre2 @k2 post2; post]
> >
> > I was thinking that this should yield a citation object with a structure like:
> >
> > ('citation ...
> > :common-prefix pre
> > :common-suffix post
> > :references ((:prefix pre1
> > :key "k1"
> > :suffix post1 ...)
> > (:prefix pre2
> > :key "k2"
> > :suffix post2 ...))
> > ...)
> >
> > Would that work?
>
> Yes. I find it better than "entries/entry" as discussed with Rasmus.
> I'll implement it in a few days.
>
> > Oh, I did not realize there were outstanding issues with this. I
> > remember Rasmus not liking `&'. I'm fine with changing it, though I
> > cannot think of a better symbol. Does someone think we should not have
> > a way of indicating that a reference should produce a full bibliography
> > entry? Or that we should indicate it in some other way?
>
> AFAIC, I don't think a dedicated symbol is useful. It can be implemented
> through subtypes/properties. Besides LaTeX, could other back-end provide
> that feature anyway?
>
I have done this with zotxt for HTML and odt export, so it should be possible. I personally really like this, as I have a personal use case (course syllabi) where I need this all the time. But I may be unusual in this.
Matt
> I have no opinion about the :suppress-author symbol.
>
>
> Regards,
>
- Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, (continued)
- Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Rasmus, 2015/03/02
- Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/03/02
- Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Rasmus, 2015/03/02
- Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/03/02
- Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Rasmus, 2015/03/02
- Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/03/02
- Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Rasmus, 2015/03/02
- Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Richard Lawrence, 2015/03/02
- Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/03/03
- Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Richard Lawrence, 2015/03/03
- Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal,
Matt Price <=
- Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/03/07
Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Aaron Ecay, 2015/03/03
Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Aaron Ecay, 2015/03/02
Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Aaron Ecay, 2015/03/03
Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal, Rasmus, 2015/03/02