[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] comment section with latex_header
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] comment section with latex_header |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Mar 2015 21:14:32 +0100 |
Sebastien Vauban <sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/address@hidden>
writes:
> Can't we say that a COMMENT'ed subtree is like having all of its
> contents commented, line by line? IOW, nothing "accessible"?
There is, at least, one problem. Comments are always comments (really).
However COMMENT keyword is only active during export. That means the
behaviour will differ unexpectedly when exporting a document, as
reported by Robert Klein.
Anyway, anything is possible as long as it is clearly documented.
Regards,
- Re: [O] comment section with latex_header, (continued)
- Re: [O] comment section with latex_header, Sebastien Vauban, 2015/03/24
- Re: [O] comment section with latex_header, Robert Klein, 2015/03/25
- Re: [O] comment section with latex_header, Sebastien Vauban, 2015/03/26
- Re: [O] comment section with latex_header, Andreas Leha, 2015/03/26
- Re: [O] comment section with latex_header, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/03/26
- Re: [O] comment section with latex_header, Andreas Leha, 2015/03/26
- Re: [O] comment section with latex_header, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/03/27
- Re: [O] comment section with latex_header, Andreas Leha, 2015/03/27
- Re: [O] comment section with latex_header, Robert Klein, 2015/03/27
- Re: [O] comment section with latex_header, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/03/28
- Re: [O] comment section with latex_header,
Nicolas Goaziou <=