emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] Inserted Heading Starts on Prior Heading's Fold Mark


From: Daniel E . Doherty
Subject: Re: [O] Inserted Heading Starts on Prior Heading's Fold Mark
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 15:16:14 -0500
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/24.4 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)

John,

You nailed it.  I had that variable set in my custom file to

'(org-blank-before-new-entry (quote ((heading) (plain-list-item . auto))))

which is not a proper alist.  When I chaned it back to 

'(org-blank-before-new-entry (quote ((heading . auto) (plain-list-item . 
auto))))

the bad behavior went away.

Thanks a ton for taking a look at this, John.  Back to loving org-mode!


On Mon, 06 Apr 2015 13:12:21 -0500,
John Hendy <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Daniel E. Doherty <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > I don't know when this started, but recently I've seen the following 
> > annoying
> > behavior from M-RET in org files.
> 
> I have this on my main Org file and just assumed it was due to it
> being big and Org having a tough time keeping track of all the various
> blocks (src, example, etc.), properties, ids, and whatnot. I figured
> I'd messed up the syntax in there somewhere and would just have to
> deal with this quirky behavior.
> 
> I think others have experienced this as well (e.g.
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2010-09/msg00457.html).
> 
> Can you try commenting out:
> 
> #+begin_src .emacs
> ;;(setq org-blank-before-new-entry nil)
> #_end_src
> 
> I copied my .emacs into a new config, started with emacs -Q, loaded
> that file, and then tried your original post's exercise, repeating
> after commenting out various lines in my own config file. We both had
> the above setting, and that turned out to fix it for me on your test
> file. Not sure if there's another interaction between your options vs.
> mine, though, so confirmation is needed.
> 
> 
> John
> 
> >
> > I've tried tweaking a number of these settings with no luck.
> >
> > Any ideas about what is going wrong here?
> >
> > Dan Doherty
> >
> >
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]