Re: [O] Please confirm your message

[Denis Bitouzé]

Le 14/09/15 à 08h36, Gmane Remailer 
<public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/address@hidden> a écrit :

> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (TMDA).
>
> Your message attached below is being held because the address
> <address@hidden> has not been verified.
>
> To release your message for delivery, please send an empty message
> to the following address, or use your mailer's "Reply" feature.
>
>    public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/address@hidden
>
> This confirmation verifies that your message is legitimate and not
> junk-mail. You should only have to confirm your address once.
>
> If you do not respond to this confirmation request within 14 days,
> your message will not be delivered.
>
> From: Denis Bitouzé <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Bug: \vert{} exported to markdown not as expected [8.3.1
>       (8.3.1-103-g366dc4-elpa @ /home/bitouze/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20150907/)]
> To: Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden>
> Cc: Denis Bitouzé
>       <address@hidden>,
>       public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 08:35:04 +0200 (35 minutes, 18 seconds ago)
>
>
> Le 13/09/15 à 22h47, Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> a écrit :
>
>> Denis Bitouzé <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> 1. For _, \under{} is necessary since _ at the org mode level is
>>>    exported as \_.
>>> 2. For |, source | could be okay. But I'd like to use strings as above
>>>    in tables and, AFAIK, the only way to have pipe symbols in a table at
>>>    the org mode level is to code them \vert{}.  And that's the purpose
>>>    of my bug report, \vert{} is exported as &vert;, not as "real" |.
>>>
>>> In other words, I was happy with \under{} that exports real _ and,
>>> IMHO, \vert{} should do the same with |.
>>
>> Markdown export back-end use :html conventions to translate entities.
>> For some reason, HTML prefers &vert; over |, and so does markdown.
>
> &vert; and | are displayed the same way but can have different
> "meanings".
>
>> There are a few options available:
>>
>>   1. Prefer | over &vert; in HTML
>
> Maybe I'm wrong but wouldn't this break backward compatibility?
>
>>   2. Overwrite "vert" entity with a new one that would do 1. So
>>      basically, this is 1 but on your machine only.
>
> The feature I'm requesting may be useful to others.
>
>>   3. Use a new entity that becomes | when used in HTML export.
>
> It would be harmless.
>
>> WDYT?
>
> The 3rd option looks the best one to me.
>
> Regards.
-- 
Denis