Re: [O] ox-html HOWTO? exporting #+RESULTS inside div

[Charles C. Berry]

On Fri, 6 Nov 2015, Cook, Malcolm wrote:

> > > Charles, Thanks again for you suggestion.  Alas, using 'header-args
> > >:wrap org-results-container' has the unforeseen (by me) side effect
> > >of masking my use of `#+ATTR_HTML :class dataTable` on selected
> > >exported tables (which I use to allow for search/sortable/scrollable
> > >tables).  Now, the ':class dataTable' attribute is placed on the new
> > ><div> instead of the <table> with undesired outcome.
> >
> > > Do you have any thoughts on how to accomplish both my goals (apply
> > > :class table to selected results, and making ALL results be
> > > addressable using javascript.  FYI - My application is to hide all
> > > source blocks on html open.  Clicking on a source block caption
> > > shows the source.  This provides an HTML view that hides the source
> > > until desired.  My recipients of such analysis write-ups really like
> > > this.
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > # #+PROPERTY: header-args :wrap org-results-container
> > > #
> >
> > This creates a special block and attributes on the results will apply
> > to it - not its contents.
> >
> > What you want can be obtained by creating a different special block
> > and then applying a filter. So, wrap like this
> >
> > #+PROPERTY: header-args :wrap org-results-container-to-filter
> >
> > and add a filter to `org-export-filter-special-block-functions' that
> > strips the 'to-filter' and adds the `dataTable' where it is needed.
>
> Hi Charles - ok - you've got me looking at ox aspects I've not yet explored.... 
> good!
>
> If I understand your suggestion, the filter you propose would need to 
> somehow "know" which tables I desire to be adorned with `class 
> :dataTable`.

Make a really dumb filter that just wraps a special block with something 
like

`special-block>>>' ... `<<<special-block'

and export a document that has :wrap as above. Take a look at what you 
got. With luck you can fashion args for replace-regex-in-string and call 
it once or twice to convert whatever was between those markers to what you 
want. Then turn those calls into a filter.


> How do you reckon I might declare that?
>
> Upon reflection, I wonder if following source block header syntax might 
> rather be considered "in the spirit of things" and worthy of 
> implementation:
>
>         #+begin_src R :exports value table :prefix '#+attr_html :class 
> dataTable'
>
> which would be interpreted by ob-sbe (somehow) to emit and
>         #+attr_html :class dataTable
> Immediately prior to the #+results, all of which might be further :wrapped.

The trouble is it will not be wrapped in the right place, and you are back 
to where you were when you started this thread.

> Or am I putting the cart before the horse?

I'd say so.


> Reminder (in part to self): my goal is two-fold (a) declare to the 
> ox-html exporter a :class (i.e. dataTable) to adorn selected exported 
> results tables

Of course there are other ways to solve this. You could create a derived 
backend and define a new kind of export block for it and a suitable 
transcoder. But that might seems like overkill to me.

> (b) have a means of addressing the exported html results of a code block 
> allowing to conditionally hide or expose it (i.e. toggle exposure when 
> user click on the export source code.  This is what "> #+PROPERTY: 
> header-args :wrap org-results-container" provided for me, except that 
> the introduction of the new <div> was blocking my means of doing (a)

Right. So you use replace-regex-in-string to fix that.

HTH,

Chuck