[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [lint] imagemagick
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [lint] imagemagick |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:50:12 +0100 |
Andreas Leha <address@hidden> writes:
> Exactly. I guess my implicit question was, whether we should aim to
> make :imagemagick accept 'no' as nil to be consistent with the general
> org babel conventions.
>
> As I get it, you would say: no.
Not at all. My main concern was to fix the issue. This is another one.
We could accept "no" as nil. Patches welcome.
Meanwhile, we could also add a rule to `org-lint' warning about
deprecate use of "yes" and "no" and suggest to slowly switch to nil and
t, if that's really important.
--
Nicolas