Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Yasushi SHOJI <address@hidden> writes:

> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 3:08 AM, Sebastien Vauban <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>>
>> Yasushi SHOJI <address@hidden> writes:
>> > ---- >8 ---- cut ---- >8 ----
>> > * DONE org
>> >   DEADLINE: [2016-01-07 Thu 17:39]
>> >
>> >   SCHEDULED: <2015-09-29 Tue .+1w>
>> >
>> > ---- >8 ---- cut ---- >8 ----
>>
>> A shoot in the dark: replace the [] by <>.
>>
>> [] for DEADLINE does not make much sense...
>
> thanks for your comment.
> chainging the inactive timestamp to active doesn't seem
> to change the behavior.
>
> even with an inactive time stamp, it's not a good excuse
> to show a closed entry, isn't it?

I cannot reproduce your problem? Could you try with -Q (and a minimal
Org configuration)?

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou