emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] [BUG] org-link-search fails if search string contains new lines


From: Matt Lundin
Subject: Re: [O] [BUG] org-link-search fails if search string contains new lines
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:15:34 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)

Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:

>> The problem, I think, is the regexp construction in org-link-search.
>> This was introduced back in August of 2015 with commit
>> cfe5bc97f8b18ccbf49d0764746c7563ce8d29da.
>>
>> The problematic line in org.el is 10951:
>>
>> (s-multi-re (mapconcat #'regexp-quote words "[ \t]+\\(?:\n[ \t]*\\)?"))
>>
>> The constructed regexp fails because it assumes a newline will be
>> preceded by whitespace. But often newlines are not preceded by
>> whitespace.
>>
>> Is there a reason the following won't work? 
>>
>> (s-multi-re (mapconcat #'regexp-quote words "[ \t\r\n]+"))
>>
>> This was the method org-link-search used prior to the commit above. Are
>> we trying to avoid matching across blank lines?
>
> Yes, we are.
>
> Fixed, hopefully.

Thanks Nicolas. Yes, it now works with multi-line searches that do not
contain blank lines.

I think there are some instances in which one might want to search
across blank lines, such as when one captures a region that contains one
or more blank lines. E.g., let's say org-context-in-file-links is t (the
default). If one captures a section in org.el containing a blank line,
org-link-search will fail to locate the section.

Here's a sample link to try it out. (It assumes an org-mode repository
at ~/org-mode).

 
[[file:~/org-mode/lisp/org.el::(defsubst%20org-uniquify%20(list)%0A%20"Non-destructively%20remove%20duplicate%20elements%20from%20LIST."%0A%20(let%20((res%20(copy-sequence%20list)))%20(delete-dups%20res)))%0A%0A(defsubst%20org-get-at-bol%20(property)%0A%20"Get%20text%20property%20PROPERTY%20at%20the%20beginning%20of%20line."%0A%20(get-text-property%20(point-at-bol)%20property))%0A]]

Thanks,
Matt



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]