Re: [O] [PATCH v2] org-sort: Read compare-func in interactive calls

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Kyle Meyer <address@hidden> writes:

> I think (interactive "p"), or (interactive "P\np"), would be undesirable
> because we'd be 1) changing the call signatures in a way that's not
> backward compatible and 2) positioning an argument that shouldn't
> concern most users toward the front of the argument list.

I don't understand this. Why would using (interactive "p") instead of
(interactive "P") would be incompatible? AFAIU, the only difference is
how the argument value is treated within the callee.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou