[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [PATCH] `org-clock--oldest-date` performance
|
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
|
Subject: |
Re: [O] [PATCH] `org-clock--oldest-date` performance |
|
Date: |
Sat, 20 Jan 2018 19:18:49 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) |
Jack Henahan <address@hidden> writes:
> Apologies again, didn't update the commit hash properly. I swear this is
> the last one. :|
Thank you. However, I'm surprised that `org-clock-special-range' callers
handle a nil start date. Have you tested it?
If that's true, we don't need the -50000 hack at all. Returning an empty
string might be enough.
- [O] `org-clock--oldest-date` performance, Jack Henahan, 2018/01/20
- Re: [O] `org-clock--oldest-date` performance, Nicolas Goaziou, 2018/01/20
- Re: [O] [PATCH] `org-clock--oldest-date` performance, Jack Henahan, 2018/01/20
- Re: [O] [PATCH] `org-clock--oldest-date` performance, Jack Henahan, 2018/01/20
- Re: [O] [PATCH] `org-clock--oldest-date` performance, Jack Henahan, 2018/01/20
- Re: [O] [PATCH] `org-clock--oldest-date` performance,
Nicolas Goaziou <=
- Re: [O] [PATCH] `org-clock--oldest-date` performance, Jack Henahan, 2018/01/20
- Re: [O] [PATCH] `org-clock--oldest-date` performance, Jack Henahan, 2018/01/20
- Re: [O] [PATCH] `org-clock--oldest-date` performance, Nicolas Goaziou, 2018/01/21
- Re: [O] [PATCH] `org-clock--oldest-date` performance, Jack Henahan, 2018/01/21
- Re: [O] [PATCH] `org-clock--oldest-date` performance, Nicolas Goaziou, 2018/01/21