emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] access a let* value whe ndefining a function?


From: John Kitchin
Subject: Re: [O] access a let* value whe ndefining a function?
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 14:31:53 -0400

I think that what you really want to do here is modify org-mime-compose so that you can use the send-actions argument to message-mail. In scimax-email.el I use that to be able to turn an org-heading into an email, send it, and then jump back to the heading to insert some information about the email into the heading properties after it is sent. A lot of the information gets passed via global variables. Maybe there is a better way to do that, I wrote that code a long time ago.

Otherwise, you need to figure out how to use something like a macro that captures the current-buffer and creates a lambda function with that information in it, and attaches it to the message-buffer hook somehow. For example this will display a message-box for me after the message is sent.

(let ((f `(lambda ()
    (message-box "Came from %s" ,(current-buffer)))))
  (message-mail)
  (add-hook 'kill-buffer-hook f nil t))

Some important notes is this hook is added in local mode, so it only affects that email buffer.

John

-----------------------------------
Professor John Kitchin 
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803


On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 1:40 PM Matt Price <address@hidden> wrote:
Hey, I guess this is OT.

I'm trying to advice org-mime-org-buffer-htmlize so that it returns to the org buffer when its done. I want to do something like this:

(let ((thisbuffer (current-buffer))
 (advice-add
     'mu4e-sent-handler
     :after (lambda (docid props)
              (switch-to-buffer thisbuffer)
              (advice-remove 'mu4e-sent-handler 'om-sent-advice)
              ) '((name . 'om-sent-advice)))

but by the time the hook is run, the (let) has long since lapsed, and thisbuffer is no longer defined. Can I force evaluation of the variable during definition?

Thanks,
m

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]