emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] Request on modification of org-element.el


From: Qiang Fang
Subject: Re: [O] Request on modification of org-element.el
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 10:31:33 +0800

Hello Nicolas,
The complete diff is:

$ ~/src$ git clone https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode.git
$ cd org-mode
$ git merge origin/wip-cite

Auto-merging testing/lisp/test-org-element.el
Auto-merging lisp/org-element.el
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in lisp/org-element.el
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.

$ git diff
diff --cc lisp/org-element.el
index cdb574e17,f7498fbd1..000000000
--- a/lisp/org-element.el
+++ b/lisp/org-element.el
@@@ -307,12 -322,11 +322,20 @@@ Don't modify it, set `org-element-affil
        (strike-through ,@standard-set)
        (subscript ,@standard-set)
        (superscript ,@standard-set)
++<<<<<<< HEAD
 +      ;; Ignore inline babel call and inline source block as formulas
 +      ;; are possible.  Also ignore line breaks and statistics
 +      ;; cookies.
 +      (table-cell bold code entity export-snippet footnote-reference italic
 +                latex-fragment link macro radio-target strike-through
 +                subscript superscript target timestamp underline verbatim)
++=======
+       ;; Ignore inline babel call and inline src block as formulas are
+       ;; possible.  Also ignore line breaks and statistics cookies.
+       (table-cell ,@(append '(export-snippet footnote-reference link macro
+                                            radio-target target timestamp)
+                           minimal-set))
++>>>>>>> origin/wip-cite
        (table-row table-cell)
        (underline ,@standard-set)
        (verse-block ,@standard-set)))


On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 2:32 PM Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> wrote:
Hello,

Qiang Fang <address@hidden> writes:

> I am a user of kjambunathan's org-mode-ox-odt. The odt exporter needs some
> changed in the upstream org mode. Can you please kindly review the
> request?

You need to pull again "wip-cite" branch. It was rebased against master
yesterday. So was "wip-cite-awe".

Regards,

--
Nicolas Goaziou

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]