[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Bug: C-u M-x org-footnote-action sort deletes footnotes used in
From: |
Arne Babenhauserheide |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Bug: C-u M-x org-footnote-action sort deletes footnotes used in #+include:’d files [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ /usr/share/emacs/25.3/lisp/org/)] |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Jan 2019 19:49:58 +0100 |
> Arne Babenhauserheide <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > In my setup, it deletes footnote [fn:2].
> >
> > Damn, I missed one important part in the ECM: Set
> >
> > org-footnote-section
> >
> > to nil. Does it still leave them untouched?
>
> I still cannot reproduce it.
Then I’ll need to test this in org 9.
Does it at least move footnote [fn:1] out from the Footnotes section?
If not, then the call org-footnote-action does not actually work.
> > It does not reference between included files, but references from
> > included files to the main file actually work.
>
> I'm positively sure this cannot be. Indeed "ox.el" has a comment about
> it:
>
> ;; Append ID to all footnote references and definitions, so they
> ;; become file specific and cannot collide with footnotes in other
> ;; included files.
I’m sure that this works, because I’m creating a PDF via ox-latex using those
footnotes.
Here’s the source with a full autotools setup:
https://bitbucket.org/ArneBab/1w6/src/default/Hauptdokument/ews30/
Main file:
https://bitbucket.org/ArneBab/1w6/src/cd0a985945e46389d2690b759869706df572e65f/Hauptdokument/ews30/ews.org
You can test this with the latest release:
https://www.1w6.org/releases/ews30eb1.tar.gz
Build it with
./configure; make distcheck
I hope that org 9 does not break this.
Best wishes,
Arne