Re: [O] org-tags-match-list-sublevels is very useful in some condition, why we will semi-obsolete it?

[tumashu]

At 2019-03-22 04:55:25, "Nicolas Goaziou" <address@hidden> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>tumashu <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> (defcustom org-tags-match-list-sublevels t
>>   "...
>> This variable is semi-obsolete and probably should always be true.  It
>> is better to limit inheritance to certain tags using the variables
>> `org-use-tag-inheritance' and `org-tags-exclude-from-inheritance'."
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>> "org-tags-match-list-sublevels  +  search +LEVEL>n " is a very useful tip, 
>> if you have many sublevels with many different tags,
>> it can not lost search results nearly, why we will semi-obsolete it?
>
>I do not understand your remark. Could you clarify what you mean? Do you
>have any use case for a nil `org-tags-match-list-sublevels' that cannot
>be handled with tag inheritance?
>
>Thank you.
>
>Regards,
>
>-- 
>Nicolas Goaziou

 I use a refs.org to manage my document, which is like the below example, but 
have many many headlines.

-------------------------------
* story                                                               :story:
** story1
** story2
*** sky                                                                 :sky:
** story3
*** sky                                                                 :sky:
** ...
** story100

* sky                                                                   :sky:
** sky1
*** sky story                                                         :story:
** sky2
** sky2
*** sky story                                                         :story:

------------------------------

(setq org-tags-match-list-sublevels nil) 

I seach "story" info with: "story+LEVEL>1", if I want to know more details, I 
search "story+LEVEL>2 ... 3 ... 4"  with  a user-define one key command help.


Sorry for my pool English :-(