Re: [O] lisp: scoping vars in repetitive defuns

[Adam Porter]

Joost Kremers <address@hidden> writes:

> On Wed, Sep 18 2019, Matt Price wrote:
>> Is thre away to do that kind of destructuring bind -- which
>> binds *everything* in the plist, without knowing the symbol names in
>> advance? that would be really great.
>
> let-alist perhaps?

Well, let-alist is for alists, not plists.  ;) But anyway, it's a macro,
and it does require knowing keys at compile time.  -let is a good
alternative for plists and other maps.