[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda
From: |
Adam Porter |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jan 2020 21:20:42 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
Marco Wahl <address@hidden> writes:
> For some days now C-c C-c disables column view in Org files. This helps
> me a bit and never got in my way. And I thought it would be quite
> natural and consistent to use this binding for the agenda too.
>
> What do you think about all that?
Hi Marco,
I've always had the impression that the "C-c C-c" binding was intended
to do the most obviously useful or natural action in the current
context. For example, in a capture or log buffer, it completes the
capture. With point on a #+ line, it resets buffer properties
accordingly.
I don't use column view very often, so I may be biased, but anyway: in
the general context of an Agenda buffer, I don't feel like enabling or
disabling column view is the most obviously useful or natural thing to
do, so "C-c C-c" doesn't seem like an appropriate binding to me.
- [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda, Marco Wahl, 2020/01/28
- Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda, Bastien, 2020/01/28
- Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda, Bastien, 2020/01/28
- Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda, Marco Wahl, 2020/01/28
- Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda, Bastien, 2020/01/28
- Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda, Marco Wahl, 2020/01/28
- Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda, Bastien, 2020/01/28
- Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda, Bastien, 2020/01/28
- Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda, Marco Wahl, 2020/01/28
Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda, Samuel Wales, 2020/01/28
Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda,
Adam Porter <=