[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: wip-cite status question and feedback
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: wip-cite status question and feedback |
Date: |
Sat, 02 May 2020 11:51:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
Thank you for the feedback.
Denis Maier <address@hidden> writes:
> What about using quotes if someone needs this, like so [cite: "common
> prefix; still common prefix"; pre @key post; pre @key2 post; common
> suffix] ?
Then we would have to find a way to escape the quote…
> Does that mean you'll be able to have the same or different processors
> for different backends? (Like biblatex for latex and citeproc-el for
> ODT/HTML/etc.; or when you need identical output you can use
> citeproc-el even for latex?)
With the suggested set-up, you associate a single processor to each
export back-end. The same processor can be associated to multiple export
back-ends.
Moreover, you can change this association globally, or per document.
Is that sufficient?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Nicolas Goaziou, 2020/05/02