Re: (Feature Request) have org-edit-special work inside non-environment LaTeX blocks, i.e. \( \) and \[ \]

[TEC]

Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes: 

> I don't understand what would be the best of HTML email in that 
> case.  You're neither inlining any image, nor using any fancy 
> presentation.  Yet, your email is twice as big as it could be. 
HTML is often prettier :P it's also nice to get code blocks with 
syntax highlighting.
I'm not sure quite how it happens, but with one of my earlier test 
org-msg emails in which
I sent a code block, when viewing it as plaintext in mu4e it seem 
to recognise the
language and apply syntax highlighting. Or it may have just 
applied some of the HTML styling,
I'm not entirely sure. Either way --- I thought it seemed pretty 
nifty :D

> In this mailing list, and probably in others, too, HTML email is 
> just a waste of space. 

I see what you're saying. If it's just text that's being 
communicated
why use anything more than plaintext?

> > Here we go, I think I got everything. Please give this a 
> > test-drive and let me know how it is!

I look forward to hearing your feedback on the latest path. I 
think there's a decent
chance it could be the last one :) The only thing that comes to 
mind is changing
`string-match' to `string-match-p'.

All the best,

Timothy.