Re: Possible fix for :includes header argument in org-babel C source blocks

[Brandon Guttersohn]

> <rant>
> I don't know if it's been mentioned in the "issue tracker?" thread, but
> if I could pick just *one* feature off web-based forges, it'd be
> automated testing with CI…
> [...]

Automated testing has been a massive time-saver everywhere I've seen it 
used, though I'm not sure I've ever seen it combined with the 
mailing-list-workflow that GNU and (off the top of my head) Gnome use. I 
guess a bot could just individually cherry-pick patches onto master, and 
it would usually be the correct thing to do?

> OK; IIUC, before the patch it was not possible to generate double-quoted
> includes short of backslash-escaping the double quotes; that's why I
> assumed that the goal of the patch was to make it easier to use
> double-quoted includes, which I thought worth advertising in ORG-NEWS.

Yeah, I believe you understand correctly. Ori found that you could get 
it to work if you escape the double quotes, /and/ place that string 
literal inside a quoted form, but that was more of a happy accident than 
a design choice as far as I can tell. So this patch is sort of a new 
feature, but a trivial one.