[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] allow for multiline headers
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] allow for multiline headers |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Jul 2020 12:46:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
Mario Frasca <mario@anche.no> writes:
> IMO, we are keeping org-plot artificially basic.
Exactly.
There are multiple ways to draw a diagram from a table. One could use
gnuplot, or asymptote, or R, or, matplotlib… From a design point of
view, there is no particular reason to favor one way or the other, and
I don't see how Org Plot could fit to handle all of these. OTOH, Babel
source code blocks handle all of them.
I didn't check but I think Org Plot predates Org Babel. It probably
wouldn't exist otherwise.
> But you know what?
> I'm just happy with my additions, my point was to share them with the
> wider public. I can also keep my own branch in my own repository.
> I'm fine either way. When solving conflicts will become a burden,
> I'll write again to the list.
>
> I haven't yet delved into Babel code blocks. I would need to write
> code, isn't it? Now I just need defining settings. … sounds easier,
> so I'll keep it this way, here on my PC at least.
I don't know if there's much difference between writing multiple PLOT
lines and writing a gnuplot script. It may be interesting to compare use
cases.
Also, note that when you suggest something like PLOT[0] and PLOT[1], you
are effectively suggesting to write code, with conditionals.
Anyhow, I think it is more future-proof to use, and possibly improve
"ob-gnuplot.el" so it is easier to use, than to develop PLOT keywords.
WDYT?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
- Re: [PATCH] allow for multiline headers,
Nicolas Goaziou <=