[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reply-All noise
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: Reply-All noise |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Oct 2020 11:05:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 10:53:08AM +0200, c.buhtz@posteo.jp wrote:
> On 2020-10-10 15:03 Maxim Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 1. Use "duplicate" sieve extension.
> > [..]
> >
> > 2. Just add filter
> > [..]
>
> This are workarounds but not solutions.
>
> IMO the problem is the list user that "Answers to all".
"The problem are always the others". Way to go!
Did you read the reference I sent in reply to you? Did you take
into account that this list is open to non-subscribers?
> Why should I modify my system because another one make errors?
It's not "errors". It's the way an open mailing list works.
Entering a room and yelling "Hey, all of you stop doing things
the way you're doing it. I'm gonna tell ya how you gotta do
things now" is, to put it politely, slightly unpolite :-)
Cheers
- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Reply-All noise, Russell Adams, 2020/10/30
Re: Reply-All noise, Tory S. Anderson, 2020/10/09
Re: Reply-All noise, Maxim Nikulin, 2020/10/10
- Re: Reply-All noise, c.buhtz, 2020/10/10
- Re: Reply-All noise, Eric S Fraga, 2020/10/11
- Re: Reply-All noise, c.buhtz, 2020/10/11
- Re: Reply-All noise, Eric S Fraga, 2020/10/11
- Re: Reply-All noise, Tim Cross, 2020/10/11
- Re: Reply-All noise, Eric Abrahamsen, 2020/10/11