Re: Thoughts on the standardization of Org

[TEC]

Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab@web.de> writes:

> Asa Zeren <asaizeren@gmail.com> writes:
> > Also another note is that the worg syntax document does begin 
> > to specify
> > this. My point is to bring this out into a separate document.
>
> Why should this be in a separate document? The obvious place for 
> a
> standard is worg, and the way forward is to improve what’s 
> there.

I'll try to avoid interpreting others words for them :P but my 
take is
that it while documents like the worg syntax document are 
fantastic, we
may want to add a bit more into a single more comprehensive 
document.

I have a suggestion in this regard. #+include

Why not have the best of both worlds :P

--
Timothy