[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using lexical-binding
From: |
Greg Minshall |
Subject: |
Re: Using lexical-binding |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Mar 2021 20:14:28 +0300 |
Kyle,
> Hmm, given that the lexical-binding change to ob-core was back in Org
> 9.0 (November 2016), it seems like dynamic scoping wasn't really being
> relied on (or, if it was, downstream code has already been adjusted).
> In my view it'd be better to stick with lexical scoping for these
> variables, with callers explicitly passing the subset of needed
> variables to the underlying function(s).
yes, that makes sense. thanks.
cheers, Greg
- Re: Using lexical-binding, (continued)
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Stefan Monnier, 2021/03/06
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Kyle Meyer, 2021/03/09
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Stefan Monnier, 2021/03/09
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Kyle Meyer, 2021/03/09
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Stefan Monnier, 2021/03/10
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Greg Minshall, 2021/03/19
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Greg Minshall, 2021/03/19
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Kyle Meyer, 2021/03/20
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Greg Minshall, 2021/03/20
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Kyle Meyer, 2021/03/21
- Re: Using lexical-binding,
Greg Minshall <=