[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question about citation processors [wip-cite branch]
From: |
Bruce D'Arcus |
Subject: |
Re: Question about citation processors [wip-cite branch] |
Date: |
Tue, 4 May 2021 11:04:42 -0400 |
On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 10:47 AM Joost Kremers <joostkremers@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> I can add some comments regarding biblatex:
>
> - default: \parencite[1]
WDYT of \autocite for default?
It's conceptually the same as the CSL default.
> - text: \textcite
> - author: \citeauthor[2]
> - title: \citetitle[2]
> - year: \citeyear[2]
> - locators: \notecite[3]
> - nocite: \nocite
I will add these to the markdown, and include an org version of it to
the list when it is done-ish.
Thanks!
> Biblatex of course has a wealth of citation commands, most with variants of
> different kinds. Not sure if that's relevant right now.
Yes, why I like Nicolas' idea to allow sub-styles.
[cite/text/bar:@doe]
Bruce
Re: Question about citation processors [wip-cite branch], Nicolas Goaziou, 2021/05/04