emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation process


From: Nicolas Goaziou
Subject: Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 19:15:15 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)

Hello,

Denis Maier <denismaier@mailbox.org> writes:

> By the way, I have the impression we can easily get rid of the 
> bare-variants completely. If we don't need footcitetext (or if we rename 
> the variant to note/text as that would be more appropriate, we can 
> something like this:
>
>
> | Style     | Variant       | Command      |
> |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> | author    | caps          | Citeauthor*  |
> | author    | full          | citeauthor   |
> | author    | caps-full     | Citeauthor   |
> | author    |               | citeauthor   |
> |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> | title     | full          | citetitle*   |
> | title     |               | citetitle    |
> |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> | year      | full          | citeyear*    |
> | year      |               | citeyear     |
> |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> | locators  | parens        | pnotecite    |
> | locators  | parens-caps   | Pnotecite    |
> | locators  | foot          | fnotecite    |
> | locators  | caps          | Notecite     |
> | locators  |               | notecite     |
> |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> | nocite    |               | nocite       |
> |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> | note      | text          | footcitetext |
> | note      |               | footcite     |
> |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> | smart     | caps          | Smartcite    |
> | smart     |               | smartcite    |
> |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> | super     |               | supercite    |
> |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> | foot      |               | footcite     |
> |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> | text      | caps          | Textcite     |
> | text      |               | textcite     |
> |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> | parens    | noauthor-caps | Parencite*   |
> | parens    | noauthor      | parencite*   |
> | parens    | caps          | Parencite    |
> | parens    |               | parencite    |
> |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> | plain     | noauthor-caps | Cite*        |
> | plain     | noauthor      | cite*        |
> | plain     | caps          | Cite         |
> | plain     |               | cite         |
> |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> | (default) | caps          | Autocite     |
> | (default) |               | autocite     |
>
> Well, see the revised table above. WDYT?

I'm fine with it. But I see a long discussion ensued. So, is it too
early to settle on this one, or shall I implement it?

Regards,
-- 
Nicolas Goaziou



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]