Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor

[Denis Maier]

Am 20.05.2021 um 19:15 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
> Hello,
>
> Denis Maier <denismaier@mailbox.org> writes:
>
> > By the way, I have the impression we can easily get rid of the
> > bare-variants completely. If we don't need footcitetext (or if we rename
> > the variant to note/text as that would be more appropriate, we can
> > something like this:
> >
> >
> > | Style     | Variant       | Command      |
> > |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> > | author    | caps          | Citeauthor*  |
> > | author    | full          | citeauthor   |
> > | author    | caps-full     | Citeauthor   |
> > | author    |               | citeauthor   |
> > |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> > | title     | full          | citetitle*   |
> > | title     |               | citetitle    |
> > |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> > | year      | full          | citeyear*    |
> > | year      |               | citeyear     |
> > |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> > | locators  | parens        | pnotecite    |
> > | locators  | parens-caps   | Pnotecite    |
> > | locators  | foot          | fnotecite    |
> > | locators  | caps          | Notecite     |
> > | locators  |               | notecite     |
> > |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> > | nocite    |               | nocite       |
> > |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> > | note      | text          | footcitetext |
> > | note      |               | footcite     |
> > |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> > | smart     | caps          | Smartcite    |
> > | smart     |               | smartcite    |
> > |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> > | super     |               | supercite    |
> > |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> > | foot      |               | footcite     |
> > |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> > | text      | caps          | Textcite     |
> > | text      |               | textcite     |
> > |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> > | parens    | noauthor-caps | Parencite*   |
> > | parens    | noauthor      | parencite*   |
> > | parens    | caps          | Parencite    |
> > | parens    |               | parencite    |
> > |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> > | plain     | noauthor-caps | Cite*        |
> > | plain     | noauthor      | cite*        |
> > | plain     | caps          | Cite         |
> > | plain     |               | cite         |
> > |-----------+---------------+--------------|
> > | (default) | caps          | Autocite     |
> > | (default) |               | autocite     |
> >
> > Well, see the revised table above. WDYT?
>
> I'm fine with it. But I see a long discussion ensued. So, is it too
> early to settle on this one, or shall I implement it?

Let's wait a bit more. Maybe others want to chime in.

Just one thing I was asking myself: Will/should users be able to 
customize that? The function that handles the export doesn't look to 
complicated after all.

Denis