[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Custom <<anchor>> possibility?
From: |
Samuel Wales |
Subject: |
Re: Custom <<anchor>> possibility? |
Date: |
Thu, 20 May 2021 15:18:57 -0700 |
thanks for pointing us to this variable.
docstring says "This process ensures that these values are unique and
valid...", so it sounds like you could create non-unique or invalid
identifiers without it.
does this mean, for example, if the user exports a subtree with two
link targets with the same user label, then if this variable is
non-nil, then the output could include more than one link target?
what if this var were nil [the default], my brain is not working well
now, but it seems as if the exporter could still get confused which
target to link to, even if it is not printing duplicatedly-named
targets.
so i am curious what the purpose of the default is?
On 5/20/21, Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> wrote:
> * Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> [2021-05-20 23:00]:
>> > Is there a possibility to tell Org, that <<target>> really remains
>> > "target" as in id="target" instead of a random ID?
>>
>> See `org-html-prefer-user-labels'.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> --
> Jean
>
> Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
> https://www.fsf.org/campaigns
>
> Sign an open letter in support of Richard M. Stallman
> https://stallmansupport.org/
> https://rms-support-letter.github.io/
>
>
>
--
The Kafka Pandemic
Please learn what misopathy is.
https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com/2013/10/why-some-diseases-are-wronged.html