emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [oc-csl] testing status


From: András Simonyi
Subject: Re: [oc-csl] testing status
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 16:32:58 +0200

Dear All,

(what follows is  a copy of my reply to the corresponding citeproc-el issue)
I think I managed to track this down. First of all, the issue doesn't
affect html and latex Org exports, which use the html and latex output
of citeproc-el directly; the problematic behavior occurs only when
citeproc-el produces org output and this gets embedded in the Org
document before exporting. In the latter case, the Org exporter treats
the doi links in the bibliography as it would any doi link in the
document, and, apparently, this means converting them to urls by
default. (I don't know what is the easiest way of turning this off.)

best regards,
András

On Sun, 30 May 2021 at 23:36, Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 5:24 PM András Simonyi <andras.simonyi@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > On Sun, 30 May 2021 at 22:38, Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > There is one thing I can't figure out. Here's the output I get:
> > > I don't understand why that URL is included, as that entry has no URL.
> >
> > > It seems citeproc-el may have a parameter that substitutes DOI URL if
> > > DOI is present, but URL is absent if t?
> >
> > > András: Is that correct?
> >
> > citeproc-el definitely doesn't have this kind of functionality, it
> > must come from the used CSL style somehow. Is the result different
> > with other citeprocs?
>
> It's maybe a style issue, though I haven't figured it out yet.
>
> This is what pandoc produces with the same style etc.
>
> Low, Setha M. “The Edge and the Center: Gated Communities and the
> Discourse of Urban Fear.” American Anthropologist 103, no. 1 (March 1,
> 2001): 45–58. doi:10.1525/aa.2001.103.1.45.
>
> ... which is what I read the style
> (chicago-note-bibliography-16th-edition.csl) to specify.
>
> I'll explore more, probably tomorrow.
>
> Bruce



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]