|
From: | Alan Ristow |
Subject: | Re: Bug: Unexpected behavior marking recurring tasks as DONE |
Date: | Fri, 9 Jul 2021 09:47:24 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 |
Hi Bhavin, On 7/8/21 8:19 PM, Bhavin Gandhi wrote:
Hello Alan, Thank you for sharing a detailed description. [...] I think this is same issue as reported in this bug report: https://orgmode.org/list/87o8c8xp9b.fsf@gmail.com/
Thank you for the pointer to this -- clearly I missed it in my initial search of the mailing list archive, but I agree it appears to be the same issue. I'm glad to know that somebody has reproduced it.
Second, if I bulk-process a habit via org-agenda-bulk-action, the task is simply marked DONE. Bot the recurrence and the LAST_REPEAT field are ignored, but the time stamp is only entered into the LOGBOOK once: ** DONE Walk CLOSED: [2021-07-07 Wed 11:26] SCHEDULED: <2021-07-07 Wed .+1d> :PROPERTIES: :STYLE: habit :LAST_REPEAT: [2021-07-06 Tue 15:33] :END: :LOGBOOK: - State "DONE" from "TODO" [2021-07-07 Wed 11:26] - State "DONE" from "TODO" [2021-07-06 Tue 15:33] :END:I was not able to reproduce this correctly, I will try to reproduce it again later.
I had a difficult time reproducing this one reliably. If I remember correctly, I could only reproduce it when I set a key binding to org-store-link. It is a binding I never use, I only set it because it was in seemingly every org config on the planet when I first started with orgmode, and I certainly don't explicitly invoke it when processing in bulk.
Looking back at my last emails, I realize I have submitted a pretty lousy bug report -- sorry for that! The init.el I used for debugging is attached, though it relies on straight and use-package for reasons of time and convenience. The org settings as-written have reproduced both behaviors reliably for me so far, and removing the "!" from org-todo-keywords has fixed them both. I am a bit pressed for time at the moment, but later today or over the weekend I will put together a more vanilla init.el that hopefully reproduces both problems (or reveals a package conflict...). I have also attached my test file, though it is not substantively different from the one you used yourself in the previous thread.
Best regards, Alan
init.el
Description: Text Data
test.org
Description: Lotus Organizer
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |