Re: [PATCH] Fontification for inline src blocks

[Timothy]

Hi Ihor,

> What about separating the src_{nil} fontification into separate patch? I
> think that part raised no objections.

That sounds like a good idea to me. We may as well get that in.

> As for the results prettifications, I look at this and similar ideas as
> at Emacs themes.  It looks nice on your screenshot with your fonts and
> colours, but may not be good for other people.  Similar to org-bullets
> and co.

The behaviour makes me think of link prettification more than what Emacs themes
do. Hiding the text {{{results( with an overlay seems like something a
major/minor mode should be responsible for, not a theme.

> I can see how some people (I am among those people) want to reduce the
> markup noise beyond hiding emphasis markers.  However, some people
> prefer not to hide text in buffer under “bells and whistles”.

Indeed, and it’s good to have this option. This is why I also introduced a new
setting, `org-inline-src-prettify-results' (similarly named to
`org-pretty-entities').

> Maybe we can create some kind of “prettify-symbol themes” replacing different
> markup elements in bulk with nice symbols/svg (e.g. inline results, block
> headers/footers, uninteresting property drawers aka org-custom-properties,
> bullets, etc)? WDYT? Also, CCing Prot as it might be of interest for him.
> Best, Ihor

I think it could make sense for some prettification capabilities to be built
into Org well. Currently there are a few little things we have, but it seems to
be handled inconsistently and I think it could be nice to provide a more unified
approach. There are also things like
<https://github.com/awth13/org-appear/blob/master/org-appear.el> which I feel 
just
make a lot of sense with Org (you never have to guess if `point' is before or
after a markup character).

All the best,
Timothy