[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Extend the existing alternative set of key bindings for terminals
From: |
Loris Bennett |
Subject: |
Re: Extend the existing alternative set of key bindings for terminals |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jan 2022 09:03:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Ihor,
Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com> writes:
> "Loris Bennett" <loris.bennett@fu-berlin.de> writes:
>
>>> Then, it is terminal input problem. See
>>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11110801/why-does-ctrl-not-work-when-i-bind-it-to-a-command-in-emacs/11118511#11118511
>>
>> You're right, the problem also happens locally when I start Emacs with
>> '-nw'. Thanks for the link - I'll have a look at the various solutions,
>> although it might just be easier to rebind the command ;-)
>
> On Org side, we have an alternative set of key bindings that is more
> compatible with terminals (see org-use-extra-keys). I think that C-c C-,
> should also be covered there. Or maybe some other keys as well.
>
> Loris, would you be interested to check which default bindings from
> org-mode-map work and which don't work in tmux/terminal and report here?
In principle, yes, but the mode map is quite extensive. Is there any
way of doing that systematically? Or is the idea that I just keep a
record of all the issues that I stumble across?
Cheers,
Loris
> Also, it appears to me that we may keep losing terminal-incompatible
> keys in future unless we provide some mechanisms to check terminal
> compatibility automatically. Any ideas?
>
> Best,
> Ihor
--
This signature is currently under construction.
- Second Ctl in keychord not detected, Loris Bennett, 2022/01/19
- Re: Second Ctl in keychord not detected, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/01/19
- Re: Second Ctl in keychord not detected, Loris Bennett, 2022/01/19
- Re: Second Ctl in keychord not detected, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/01/19
- Re: Second Ctl in keychord not detected, Loris Bennett, 2022/01/19
- Extend the existing alternative set of key bindings for terminals (was: Second Ctl in keychord not detected), Ihor Radchenko, 2022/01/19
- Re: Extend the existing alternative set of key bindings for terminals (was: Second Ctl in keychord not detected), Tim Cross, 2022/01/21
- Re: Extend the existing alternative set of key bindings for terminals (was: Second Ctl in keychord not detected), Ihor Radchenko, 2022/01/24
- Re: Extend the existing alternative set of key bindings for terminals (was: Second Ctl in keychord not detected), Tim Cross, 2022/01/25
- Re: Extend the existing alternative set of key bindings for terminals,
Loris Bennett <=
- Re: Extend the existing alternative set of key bindings for terminals, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/01/23
Re: Second Ctl in keychord not detected, Anssi Saari, 2022/01/19
Re: Second Ctl in keychord not detected, tomas, 2022/01/19