[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Timestamp with repeater interval AND END DATE?
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
Re: Timestamp with repeater interval AND END DATE? |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Jun 2022 14:45:33 +0200 |
>>>>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 12:27:23 +0100, Angel de Vicente
>>>>> <angel.vicente.garrido@gmail.com> said:
>> If you use `org-cyclic' and `org-block' you donʼt need to worry about
>> that anymore.
Angel> I tried (briefly :-)) to look for some place where org-cyclic and
Angel> org-block are documented, but failed. But I tried, and they do work
Angel> nicely. So they always assume 'iso' style regardless of the value of
Angel> 'calendar-date-style'?
Yes. They donʼt appear in the info documentation anywhere that I can
see. Thereʼs a footnote in (info "(org) Weekly/daily agenda") about
`org-anniversary' and `org-date' though.
I can send a patch against the org-mode repository main branch, or fix
it directly in the emacs repo. What's the preferred workflow for this
kind of change?
Robert
--
- Re: Timestamp with repeater interval AND END DATE?, Robert Pluim, 2022/06/10
- Re: Timestamp with repeater interval AND END DATE?, Angel de Vicente, 2022/06/10
- Re: Timestamp with repeater interval AND END DATE?,
Robert Pluim <=
- Re: Timestamp with repeater interval AND END DATE?, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/06/10
- Re: Timestamp with repeater interval AND END DATE?, Robert Pluim, 2022/06/10
- Re: Timestamp with repeater interval AND END DATE?, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/06/10
- Re: Timestamp with repeater interval AND END DATE?, Robert Pluim, 2022/06/10
- Re: Timestamp with repeater interval AND END DATE?, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/06/11
- Ambiguity in commit message conventions for org, Robert Pluim, 2022/06/10
- Re: Ambiguity in commit message conventions for org, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/06/10
- Re: Ambiguity in commit message conventions for org, Robert Pluim, 2022/06/10