Re: oc-basic: CSL-JSON year as number vs. string (nativecomp?)

[Bruce D'Arcus]

On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 8:04 AM Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> "Bruce D'Arcus" <bdarcus@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I created CSL, and have helped develop the data schema.
> >
> > BTW, just to look forward, it's likely we'll change the date property
> > to prefer an EDTF string; same as biblatex does now.
>
> Have you ever checked if oc-basic parser complies with the schema?
> It is clear that is not for year field, but I am wondering about other
> fields.

I had not. But the schema doesn't have a lot of rules.

Aside from dates, the other structured object definition is for
(author etc) names.

oc-basic ignores the properties beyond "family" and "given" names,
most of which probably don't matter for this purpose, except maybe
"literal" (for organizational authors).

Bruce