emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[FR] Make :var foo=name-of-src-block assign the source block code instea


From: Ihor Radchenko
Subject: [FR] Make :var foo=name-of-src-block assign the source block code instead of currently assigned result of evaluation (was: [PATCH] Add :noweb-prefix and :noweb-trans babel header arguments)
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 16:57:32 +0800

Sébastien Miquel <sebastien.miquel@posteo.eu> writes:

> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>> Can you provide more concrete examples?
>>
>>> Some drawbacks:
>>>    + doesn't work for all languages (does work for LaTeX)
>> Which languages do not work?
> Most languages do not work. Using your proposed solution, what I'm
> trying to do is
>
> #+name:javascript-header
> #+begin_src javascript :tangle no
> some javascript, with \ and " to be escaped
> #+end_src
>
> #+name: string-escape
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var str="" :tangle no
> (prin1-to-string (string-trim-right str))
> #+end_src
>
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp :noweb yes :tangle yes
> (setq javascript-header <<string-escape(str=javascript-header)>>)
> #+end_src
>
> If you replace javascript with latex, it happens to work, because when
> org executes a latex block, it prints its content.
>
> The goal is to tangle to some lisp code whose purpose is to generate
> LaTeX/javascript code. Quite niche admittedly, though as you showed,
> it could also be used to string-escape documentation.

Thanks for providing an example!

The current behaviour of :var foo=name-of-src-block is assigning result
of evaluation. However, this behaviour is actually not documented.
16.4 Environment of a Code Block section of the manual only documents
uses like
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :var length=table-length()
or
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :var input=double(input=1)

Currently,
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :var length=table-length
is the same with
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :var length=table-length()

Given that
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :var x=literal-example

inserts the literal contents of the example block, I am voting to change
the current undocumented behaviour for assigning the code block
references.

This will make the discussed example work while not restricting the
existing features.

WDYT?

Best,
Ihor



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]