Re: [FR] Display stderr contents after executing shell blocks (even when stdout :results output is requested) (was: Org 9.6-pre and Bash sessions)

[Max Nikulin]

On 29/10/2022 11:05, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> As explained in the above quote, it may be reasonable to display stderr
> in the shell (and possibly other) src blocks upon execution.
>
> + Stderr may contain important information even if the code block
>    succeeds
> - Displaying stderr will raise *Error* buffer, which may or may not be
>    expected or desired.
>
> What do you think?

I agree that stderr may be important. I would not mind to have a buffer 
that combines both stderr and stdout (maybe fontified). Despite order of 
messages in separate streams is not strictly defined, it still may shed 
some light on the reason what went wrong.