Re: Does variable 'org-goto-interface' exist?

[Max Nikulin]

On 14/12/2022 14:55, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Max Nikulin writes:
> > Perhaps it is better to introduce some more concise notation to specify
> > the package where a custom option or variable is defined like
> > ~org-goto-interface~ (=org-goto.el=).

...

> Note, however, that org-goto is probably not the only place where we
> refer to a customization that is not loaded by default.

This the exact reason why I decided to consider some general convention.

> So, maintaining the proposed convention might not work well.

I agree. In addition, I do not see a way to make such convention 
semi-active to help users to access docs easier.

So I suggest to leave the Org manual as is and perhaps to improve C-h 
completion instead. Actually I am surprised that symbols are not 
transformed to help links in info buffers.